Gap

Holes become hypotheses.

The void, opportunity and next-question engine. Where a citation chain doesn't hold, the hole is stored as a falsifiable hypothesis with the study and statistical bar to settle it — your next contribution, pre-registered.

See it live on the origins of AI → Start your own field

[ THE JOBS IT DOES ]

[

When I need a defensible contribution, I want the holes the literature left — not another crowded topic.

[

When I find a gap, I want the exact study and statistical bar that would close it.

[

When a void opens, I want to be the one who gets connected to it.

[ WHAT'S REAL · WHAT'S NEXT ]

Live today, and what compounds next

◆ Live now

Gap extraction on citation edges — never invented.
Five gap kinds, each mapped to a void type: evidence, method, theoretical, generalizability, reproducibility.
A settled score, −100 (refuted) to +100 (validated) — how far the literature already sits.
Methodology and required statistical proof on every gap.
Express interest — a line when the void opens, no account.

○ On the roadmap

Novelty / feasibility / impact / readiness scoring.ROADMAP
"Why this gap exists"; suggested persona, collaborators and funding route.ROADMAP
Thesis-topic and grant-topic shortlists; "don't pursue" warnings.ROADMAP

[ OUTPUTS ]

Pre-registered gap cardPer-field gap vault

[ WHO IT'S FOR ]

PostdocsPhD studentsR&D strategistsFunding bodies

This one's live. Watch it read a real field.

The origins-of-AI walk updates hourly — or point it at your own field in minutes.

Open the live demo → Start a field

[ SAME ENGINE · OTHER DOORS ]

One walk of your field feeds every product. Gap connects most closely to:

Map The shape of the field. Validate Trust, evidence, gravity. Radar The strategy behind the science. Learn Foundational to frontier.

Part of the Think North platform — like CodeNSM watches your codebase, Re: Sach watches your field. Clarity. Before Commitment.